Andy Matthews is an Authorised Rep 288742 and Credit Rep 403608 of Sensible Super Pty Ltd ABN 81 603 346 881, Authorised Rep 1243004 and Credit Rep 488535 of FYG Planners Pty Ltd
ABN 55 094 972 540, AFSL/ACL 224543, and provides advice on aged care, investments, superannuation and insurance.
Office is located at 52 French Street, Maroubra NSW 2035.
Phone 0402 466 640. email andy[at]sensiblesuper.com.au
From The New York Times By JEFF SOMMER Published: June 4, 2011 FOR nearly all investors, frequent trading is a terrible proposition. Many people know they trade more than they should — but they just can’t stop.
The fundamental problem with frequent trading is that very few people can consistently outsmart the market — at least not while playing by the rules. Behavioral biases lead many of us to trade at the wrong times. It can be comforting, for example, to buy when stocks are rising and nearly irresistible to sell when they are plummeting, as they did last week. This means buying high and selling low, a fine recipe for financial misery. Furthermore, when costs mount, as they will when you trade frequently, the odds of beating the market are slim indeed.
It’s been long known that these kinds of mistakes have serious consequences. A study by Dalbar, a mutual fund research firm in Boston, found that in the 20 years through December, the average stock fund investor had annualized returns of 3.8 percent, compared with 9.1 percent for the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index. The average person, in short, would have been much better off buying an index fund and holding it for 20 years.
Now, a new study of affluent investors shows that many well-heeled and apparently well-informed people feel compelled to trade frequently — believing all the while that their trading is excessive. The existence of this “trading paradox” is a central finding of the study, which was conducted by Barclays Wealth, a division of Barclays, the global bank based in London. The study, “Risk and Rules: The Role of Control in Financial Decision Making,” is to be published on Monday. The company provided a copy to The New York Times.
“This trading paradox exists, to one degree or another, everywhere in the world,” Greg B. Davies, the head of behavioral and quantitative finance at Barclays Wealth, said in a telephone interview. “Not everyone is prone to frequent trading, but among those who feel that they must trade frequently to do well, there is a substantial proportion who are troubled by their behavior. This is a novel finding for me.” ...